Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 146 HAW 120 - State v. Pitts.

State v. Pitts.’s Empirical Analysis

2019

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ake v. Oklahoma · State v. Estrada · State v. Moriwake · State v. Rogan · State v. Furutani

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a conviction is largely dependent on a jury's determination as to the credibility of a complainant's testimony, we have held that the evidence of the offense is not so 'overwhelming' that it renders the prosecutor's improper statements harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Despite this broad authority, . . . motions for new trials are not favored and new trials are to be granted with 4 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER caution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Where evidence of a clearly exculpatory nature is known to the prosecution, such evidence must be presented to the grand jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.