Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

147 N.J. 433

In re Ojeda

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 6, 1997

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1997-02-06

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-02-06

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 2019

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 12 state decisions

70199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1CONSENT ORDER

¶2THIS MATTER, having been opened to the Court by DAVID E. JOHNSON, JR., Director, Office of Attorney Ethics, and with the consent of the respondent, Angel Ojeda, Jr., of Hackensack, and it appearing that the Office of Attorney Ethics and Respondent having agreed that respondent is presently unable to engage in the practice of law and should be transferred to disability inactive status in accordance with R.l:20-12(b).

¶3IT IS ORDERED that:

¶41. Pursuant to R.l:20-12(b) Angel Ojeda, Jr. of Hackensack, admitted to practice in this state in 1989, is hereby transferred to disability inactive status, effective immediately, pending final determination of all grievances, and until further Order of the Court.

¶52. Angel Ojeda, Jr. is hereby restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period that he remains on disability inactive status.

¶63. Angel Ojeda, Jr. shall comply with R.l:20-20 governing suspended, disbarred and incapacitated attorneys.

/147/nj/433 · .json · Public domain