¶1But THE COURT refused, and directed that the entry of the judgment of the court be, “that the said Thomas Plumsell be precluded from any benefit under the act,” &c., according to the precedent in Newton’s Case [Case No. 10,188], at April term, 1824.
¶2See the case of Keirll v. McIntire [Case No. 7,651], at May term, 1826, and Eckle v. Fitzgerald [Id. 4,267], at this term.