Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 15 FSUPP 31 - In re Runge

In re Runge’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
April 1961
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 1961

4 federal appellate ·

501936194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wetmore v. Markoe · Maier v. Maier

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * The mere fact that a judgment has been rendered does not prevent the court from looking into the proceedings with a view of determining the nature of the liability which has been reduced to judgment.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.