Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

15 Me. 20

Dore v. Hight

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 15, 1838

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · decided 1838-06-15

The action was replevin. The defendant as collector of taxes took the goods and chattels replevied as the property of John Ware for the payment of taxes, and the jury found, that the chattels were the property of said Ware, and not the property of the plaintiff. Judgment was rendered for a return and restitution.

Decided 1838-06-15

¶1The opinion of the Court was prepared by

Weston C. J.

¶2The authority, under which the defendant, as collector of taxes, took the chattels in controversy, was in effect a process of execution. In such case, judgment being rendered for a return and restitution, the interest of six per cent, upon the penal sum of the bond, is by statute to be the rule for estimating the plaintiff’s damages. The plaintiff here intended, is manifestly the plaintiff in the execution. The plaintiff in the suit before the court, is in the same section called the plaintiff in replevin. The plain and obvious meaning of this section, requires this construction.

¶3Judgment on the verdict.

/15/me/20 · .json · Public domain