Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 15 N.J. 315 - Stultz v. Stultz

Stultz v. Stultz’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
4
states following
May 2003
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently May 2003 · most notably Fantony v. Fantony (1956), 48 N.J. Super. 566 - Gosschalk v. Gosschalk (1958)

25 state decisions

90195419601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. State of North Carolina · Sherrer v. Sherrer · Coe v. Coe · Staedler v. Staedler · O'Loughlin v. O'Loughlin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Considerations of comity forbid interference with the prosecution of a proceeding in a foreign jurisdiction capable of affording adequate relief and doing complete justice, unless there be a special equity sufficient in conscience to stay the hand of the defendant. The question is not the existence of the power but the propriety of its exercise in a given case. The rule of comity is grounded in the policy of avoiding conflicts of jurisdiction, unless upon strong grounds, and the general principle that the court which first acquires jurisdiction of the issue has precedence. [at 179]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Where there is a voluntary submission to the foreign jurisdiction there is no ground for intervention by the New Jersey courts, or rather there is no ground unless there be a special equity justifying such relief notwithstanding the appearance.” (At page 319)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.