15 Stock. 346
134 A 917
Decided October 27, 1926
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1926-10-27
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1926-10-27
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1953
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.
¶2 For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, "Van Buskirk, MoGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 14.
¶3 For reversal — None.