Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

15 Stock. 554

135 A 917

Gluck v. Rynda Development Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 31, 1927

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1927-01-31

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1927-01-31

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 1958

3 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

801927193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1 Vice-Chancellor Berry, who heard this case in the court of chancery, advised a decree dismissing the complainants’ bill of complaint.

¶2 Our reading of the record leads us to the same conclusion as that of the learned vice-chancellor. We agree with the findings of fact as made by the vice-chancellor. We also agree with his application of the legal principles.

¶3 The decree of the court of chancery dismissing the complainants’ bill is therefore affirmed and the decree is in all other respects affirmed.

¶4 For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Min-turn, Kalisoit, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hbteield, JJ. IS.

¶5 For reversal — None.

/15/stock/554 · .json · Public domain