Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 150 A3D 1042 - In re Eakin

In re Eakin’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Matter of Sylvester · Matter of Larsen · In Re Melograne · In re Greenberg · In Re Cicchetti

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Despite the Board's prior subpoenas, OAG did not inform the Board of its possession of any emails from Justice Eakin's 'John Smith' email address beyond the 48 Outlook files received by the Board on November 5, 2014, and did not provide them to the Board until September 28, 2015.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Based on their review, Board staff concluded that the September 28, 2015 disc [sent by the OAG] contained emails that had not been seen by any Board staff member during the 2014 investigation of Justice Eakin.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “presented credible witnesses that his judicial opinions were not reflective of any of the biases expressed in any of the emails, but instead were decided, in each case, in accordance with the facts and law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.