Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

697 A.2d 297

In Re Cicchetti

Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 1997

This page is marked noindex.

Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · decided 1997-03-31

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“(1)The Board and the Judicial Officer may elect to file written objections which shall include the basis for the objections to the Court’s findings and conclusions. (2) Any objections shall be filed with the Court within 10 days of the entry of the findings and conclusions. A copy of the objections shall be served upon the opposing party. The President Judge may for cause shown extend the time for filing objections. (3) The Court may permit the Judicial Officer and the Board to present oral argument on any objections filed.”

quoted by 3 later decisions, including In Re Strock, In Re Nakoski Ex Rel. Magisterial District 06-3-01

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-03-31

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably In Re Cicchetti (2000), In Re Trkula (1997)

50 state decisions

300199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1AND NOW, this 31st day of March, 1997, based upon the Opinion filed herewith, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

¶2That, pursuant to C.J. D.R.P. No. 503, the attached Opinion with Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law be and it is hereby filed, and shall be served upon the Judicial Conduct Board and upon the Respondent,

¶3That, either party may elect to file written objections to the findings and conclusions of the Court, stating therein the basis for those objections, provided that such objections shall be filed with the Court within ten (10) days of the date of the entry of this Order, and a copy thereof served upon the opposing party.

¶4That, in the event such objections are filed, the Court shall determine whether to entertain oral argument upon the objections, and issue an Order setting a date for such oral argument, and

¶5That, in the event that timely objections are not filed within ten (10) days, or the Court decides that oral argument shall not be presented, this Court will issue an Order setting a date, pursuant to C.J. D.R.P. No. 504, for a hearing on the issue of sanctions.

/697/a2d/297 · .json · Public domain