Powell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 54th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on O'NEAL v. McAninch · Montgomery v. State · Dinkins v. State · Motilla v. State · Moses v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Powell’s counsel pointed out numerous discrepancies between Officer Spann’s report and his testimony regarding the events Spann observed on the occasion in question. Powell presented evidence that he was not driving the car on the occasion in question and an explanation for how his identification card came to be in the car. The State argued that Powell’s parole status proves his motive and thus “puts this defendant behind the wheel.” Although the State offered probative evidence of Powell’s identity, it cannot be characterized as “overwhelming.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Powell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.