Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 151 SW3D 646 - Powell v. State

Powell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 54th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on O'NEAL v. McAninch · Montgomery v. State · Dinkins v. State · Motilla v. State · Moses v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Powell’s counsel pointed out numerous discrepancies between Officer Spann’s report and his testimony regarding the events Spann observed on the occasion in question. Powell presented evidence that he was not driving the car on the occasion in question and an explanation for how his identification card came to be in the car. The State argued that Powell’s parole status proves his motive and thus “puts this defendant behind the wheel.” Although the State offered probative evidence of Powell’s identity, it cannot be characterized as “overwhelming.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.