Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 F.2d 123 - Mays v. Burgess

Mays v. Burgess’s Empirical Analysis

152 F.2d 123 · 1945

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
August 2011
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2011

9 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

7019451950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 41

Relies on United States v. Swift & Co. · In re Sanford Fork & Tool Co. · Swift & Co. v. United States · Milk Wagon Drivers Union of Chicago Local 753 v. Meadowmoor Dairies · In re Potts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whatever was before the court, and is disposed of, is considered as finally settled. The inferior court is bound by the decree as the law of the case; and must carry it into execution, according to the mandate. They cannot vary it, or examine it for any other purpose than execution; nor give any other or further relief”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.