Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 154 F.3d 51 - Sparman v. Edwards

Sparman v. Edwards’s Empirical Analysis

154 F.3d 51 · 1998

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
October 2024
most recently cited

32 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Eze v. Senkowski (2003), United States of America v. Zolton Williams (2000)

32 federal appellate ·

4701998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Dukes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a district court facing the question of constitutional ineffectiveness of counsel should, except in highly unusual circumstances, offer the assertedly ineffective attorney an opportunity to be heard and to present evidence, in the form of live testimony, affidavits, or briefs”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.