Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

154 Ind. App. 594

290 N.E.2d 504

Rhodes v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1972

Indiana Court of Appeals · decided 1972-12-21

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently October 1984 · most notably Ballard v. State (1974), 156 Ind. App. 469 - Sargent v. State (1973)

29 state decisions

Relies on Baker v. State · Allman v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1972-12-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

White, J.,

¶1Concurring. I concur in affirmance because the victim of this robbery had sufficient opportunity to observe his robber to render his identification testimony both substantial and probative. This case is thereby distinguished from Baker v. State (1956), 236 Ind. 55, 138 N.E.2d 641, and Gaddis v. State (1969), 253 Ind. 23, 251 N.E.2d at 658.

¶2I concur in the majority opinion only to the extent that it expresses views which are not in conflict with the views expressed in Bakerand Gaddis.

¶3Note. — Reported at 290 N.E.2d 504.

/154/indapp/594 · .json · Public domain