154 Pa. 355
Decided April 10, 1893
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1893-04-10
Appeal, No. 263, Jan. T., 1893, by plaintiff, William B. Laucks, from order of C. P. Berks Co., June T., 1892, No. 19, dismissing exceptions to report of auditor. Distribution of proceeds of sheriff’s sale. The auditor, Samue'l L. Young, Esq., found that the fund in dispute here was realized from real estate sold by the sheriff as the property of Webster S. Michael.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1901
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1893-04-10
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1As the auditor and court below awarded to the appellant the whole of the fund left after paying the judgment of Haak, the only question remaining for practical consideration was, whether Haak’s judgment was to be considered as paid because of the renewal of the note, against liability on which the judgment was given as security. On that question-we agree entirely with the learned court below, and affirm the final decree for the reasons stated in the opinion.
¶2Decree affirmed.