¶1ERROR TO CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.
¶2Bailey- v. Glark, 21 Wall. 284, followed.
¶3Mr. Attorney General for plaintiff in error.
¶4■ Mr. J. E. Burrill for defendant in error.
¶6delivered the opinion of the court.
¶7This ca.se involves the same question which was considered and determined in the case of Bailey v. Clark, 21 Wall. 284, just decided, and upon the authority of that case the judgment is
¶8Affirmed.