Gage v. Carraher

Supreme Court of the United States

Submitted April 6, 1880.

Decided April 12, 1880.

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1880-04-12

<p>APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS.</p>

2 counsel of record

Relies on Meyer v. Construction Co.

Affirmed · 9–0 · Decided 1880-04-12

¶1APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS.

¶2Removal Cases, 100 U. S. 457, followed.

¶3Mr. Henry D. Beam for appellant.

¶4Mr. James E. Munroe and Mr. W. C. Goudy for appellee.

¶5Mr. Chief Justice Waite

¶6delivered the opinion of the court.

¶7The order remanding this cause to the state court is affirmed qn the authority of Meyer v. Construction Co., 100 U. S. 457. • Carraher occupies one side of the controversy about which the suit is brought, that is to say, the title to the property in question* and Portia Gage, Henry H. Gage and John Forsythe the other. Henry H. Gage and Forsythe are citizens of the same State with Carraher. There is no controversy in the suit which is wholly between citizens of different States and which can be fully determined as between them. Affirmed.