¶1ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS.
¶2Boberts v. Bolles, 101 Ú. S. 119, followed.
¶3Mr. Andreio J. Bell for plaintiff in error.
¶4Mr. George O. Ide for defendants in error.
¶6delivered the opinion of the court.
¶7The judgment in this case is affirmed on the authority of Roberts v. Bolles, 101 U. S. 119, which we see no reason for reconsidering. Affirmed.