United States v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis
155 F.3d 245 · 1998
Citation profile
62 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 122 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably United States v. Davis (2005), United States v. Brennan (2003)
62 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1342 · 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3563 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 18 U.S.C. § 3651
Relies on United States v. Olano · United States v. Young · United States v. Atkinson · Schlossberg v. Maryland Comptroller of the Treasury · United States v. Kopp
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 122 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“imposing a sentence not authorized by law seriously affects the fairness, integrity, and reputation of the proceedings.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“affected the outcome of the district court proceedings.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[T]he base offense level ... shall be determined on the basis of the following: (1) (A) all acts and omissions committed, aided, abetted, counseled, commanded, induced, procured, or willfully caused by the defendant; and (B) in the case of a jointly undertaken criminal activity (a criminal plan, scheme, endeavor, or enterprise undertaken by the defendant in concert with others, whether or not charged as a conspiracy), all reasonably foreseeable acts and omissions of others in furtherance of the jointly undertaken criminal activity, that occurred during the commission of the offense of conviction, in preparation for that offense, or in the course of attempting to avoid detection or responsibility for that offense[.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.