Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 156 Ohio St. 3d 207 - State v. Cupp

156 Ohio St. 3d 207 - State v. Cupp’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
1
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

55 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mills v. Green · Dove v. United States · Fortner v. Thomas · State v. Richardson (Slip Opinion) · Franchise Developers, Inc. v. City of Cincinnati

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] defendant is not entitled to jail-time credit while held on bond if, at the same time, the defendant is serving a sentence on an unrelated case”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “even if Cupp had posted bond, he could not have been released from incarceration, because his -7- Clermont CA2019-08-068 confinement did not arise at that time out of the felony offenses; rather, his confinement related to the probation violation regarding the domestic-violence charge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The sentence for a probation violation [now referred to as community control] wholly related to the matter involving the predicate criminal conduct-separate and apart from other consequences for illegal activities engaged in while on probation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.