Begley v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 1973

Indiana Court of Appeals · decided 1973-07-26

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1979

3 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

““PER CURIAM — Begley appeals from the denial of his petition for post conviction relief. The issue concerns the authority of the Parole Board to recompute the expiration of Begley’s sentence. Begley escaped from custody and as a result served time in a Federal Prison. The Parole Board extended the maximum expiration date to compensate for Begley’s absence from Indiana while serving in the Federal Prison.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 178 Ind. App. 692 - Woodson v. State

Relies on Hendrixson v. Lash · 154 Ind. App. 498 - Phend v. Thais

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1973-07-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam

¶1Begley appeals from the denial of his petition for post conviction relief.

¶2The issue concerns the authority of the Parole Board to recompute the expiration of Begley’s sentence. Begley escaped from custody and as a result served time in a Federal Prison. The Parole Board extended the maximum expiration date to compensate for Begley’s absence from Indiana while serving in the Federal Prison.

¶3The issue raised has been adversely decided to Begley’s interest. Hendrixson v. Lash (1972), 258 Ind. 550, 282 N.E.2d 792; Phend v. Thais (1972), 154 Ind. App. 498, 290 N.E.2d 128.

¶4Judgment affirmed.

¶5Note. — Reported at 299 N.E.2d 238.