¶1AFFIRMED. We affirm the trial court’s denial of the motion to correct illegal sentence as it concerns the imposition of consecutive standard sentences. Smith v. State, 886 So.2d 336, 337-38 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). Our ruling is without prejudice for the Appellant to raise his double jeopardy argument in a timely-filed Rule 3.850 motion.
157 So. 3d 507
Taylor v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 13, 2015
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2015-02-13
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 2016
Relies on Hinton v. Hinton
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2015-02-13
View the full empirical analysis of this case →