158 F. Supp. 3d 309 - Tyson v. Access Services’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (§ 101 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12112 (§ 102 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12203 (§ 503 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Phillips v. County of Allegheny · Krouse v. American Sterilizer Co. · Jordan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] plaintiff must show a ' specific association with a disabled individual' and that the adverse employment decision was based on ... the employees' relationships with particular disabled persons.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lowe v. STME, LLC“generalized references to association with disabled persons ... [were] not sufficient to state a claim for associational discrimination under the ADA”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lowe v. STME, LLC“[e]very hospital employee can allege at least a loose association with disabled patients”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lowe v. STME, LLC
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.