Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

158 Ga. 103

Luke v. Luke

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 16, 1924

Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1924-04-16

Relies on Ward v. Ward

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1924-04-16

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 1983

10 state decisions

301924193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ON MOTION ROE REHEARING.

¶2Whether the first order taken be construed as an order fixing a date for the hearing of the motion in vacation or as fixing a date *114in term, it was sufficient to preserve the rights of the movant, as to filing amendments to the motion for new trial as well as preparing and filing a brief of the evidence. This case differs in its facts from the case of Warde v. Warde, 134 Ga. 714 (68 S. E. 478).

¶3Motion for rehearing overruled.

/158/ga/103 · .json · Public domain