Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 Fla. 604 - Ogden v. Ogden

Ogden v. Ogden’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
4
states following
October 2000
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently October 2000 · most notably 40 So. 2d 209 - Harmon v. Harmon (1949), 46 So. 2d 464 - Pawley v. Pawley (1950)

2 federal appellate · 46 state decisions

1701947195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barber v. Barber · 48 Cal. App. 674 - Ohio Electric Car Co. v. Duffet · Lechner v. Lechner · Parker v. Parker · Bates v. Bates

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the best proof of one's domicile is where he says it is.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"We do not understand the rule of international comity to require the courts of this country to recognize and give effect to the judgments of an English Court that are not final. If permitted to reason by analogy, it may be said that such is the effect of the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution of the United States as to judgments of other States."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “To actuate the doctrine of judicial comity or reciprocity, the foreign judgment must partake of the elements that would support it if procured in this country.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.