Ex parte William Keith Robey.’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915
Relies on Bounds v. Smith · Smith v. Bennett · McNaughton v. United Healthcare Services, Inc. · 807 So. 2d 534 - Ex Parte Carter · Cooper v. Wiman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there has never been any more than $31.47 in the [prisoner's] account at any one time” and the filing fee was $95); Robinson v. State, 629 So.2d 5, 5 (Ala.Crim.App.1993) (reversing order denying IFP status when prisoner's IFP declaration”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cook v. Bentley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.