Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 161 F.2d 881 - United States v. Hoffman

United States v. Hoffman’s Empirical Analysis

161 F.2d 881 · 1947

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 1964
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1964

8 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

80194719501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gompers v. United States · Pendergast v. United States · United States v. Goldman · United States v. Burroughs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If an appeal shall be taken pursuant to this section to any circuit court of appeals or to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, which, in the opinion of such court, should have been taken directly to the Supreme Court of the United States, such court shall certify the case to the Supreme Court of the United States, which shall thereupon have jurisdiction to hear and determine the cause to the same extent as if an appeal had been taken directly to that Court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““From an order or judgment, sustaining a special plea in bar, where the defendant has not been put in jeopardy * * *.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.