Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

161 N.J. 515

737 A.2d 55

State v. Timmendequas

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 11, 1999

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1999-08-11

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-08-11

How this case has been cited

Cited by 124 later decisions — most recently November 2020 · most notably Commonwealth v. Eichinger (2007), State v. Fortin (2004)

123 state decisions

9101999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

KING, P.J.A.D.

¶1(temporarily assigned), dissenting in part and concurring in part.

¶2For the reasons given by Justice Handler in IV (page 692 to 711, 737 A.2d page 153 to 165) of his dissenting opinion, I agree that prosecutorial misconduct tainted the trial proceeding insofar as the death sentence is concerned. Since the evidence of guilt was so overwhelming I do not think that such misconduct had the capacity to taint the guilt finding. I would remand for a new penalty-phase trial only. In all other respects I join the majority opinion insofar as it affirms the guilty verdict.

/161/nj/515 · .json · Public domain