Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 164 F. Supp. 2d 591 - Williams v. Wasserman

164 F. Supp. 2d 591 - Williams v. Wasserman’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12131 (§ 201 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (§ 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12182 (§ 302 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on County of Sacramento v. Lewis · Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. Romeo · Tommy Olmstead Commissioner Georgia Department of Human Resourcess v. L C Jonathan Zimring · PGA Tour, Inc. v. Martin · Kristen Elisabeth Baird Nancy Baird v. Susan Elizabeth Rose

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Defendants have not demonstrated that they have a comprehensive effectively working plan for placing qualified persons with mental disabilities in less restrictive settings.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “role in the course of de-institutionalization[, the] development of community-based treatment programs for all Maryland citizens with mental and developmental disabilities,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “been gradually closing institutions and expanding the number and range of community-based treatment programs it offers for people with severe disabilities”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.