Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

164 Pa. 352

Geiger v. Peterson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 1894

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1894-10-15

Appeal, No. 36, Oct. T., 1894, by assignee of defendant, mortgagee, from order of C. P. Westmoreland Co.,'Aug. T., 1893, No. 412, dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report. Exceptions to report of H. W. Walkinshaw, Esq., auditor. The following opinion was filed by Doty, P. J.: “ The fund was paid into court on petition of the mortgagor under the provisions of the act of April 3, 1851, § 14, P. L. 871.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1930

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1894-10-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam,

¶1The fund distributed, $2,013, was paid into court by the mortgagor under the act of April 3, 1851, P. L. 871, and the only contention here is as to the right of George W. Geiger, the mortgagor, to participate in the distribution to the extent of $150.97 awarded to him by the learned auditor and court below.

¶2*355We have considered the question, and are satisfied that there is no error in the distribution. All that can be profitably said on the subject is contained in the opinion of the learned president of the common pleas ; and on it we affirm the decree and dismiss the appeal, with costs to be paid by the appellant, James Rumbaugh.

/164/pa/352 · .json · Public domain