164 Pa. 566
Decided November 5, 1894
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1894-11-05
Appeal, No. 43, Oct. T., 1894, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1893, No. 646, on verdict for plaintiff. Assumpsit on promissory note given by married woman for first premium on life insurance policy.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1894-11-05
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 1940
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1There is nothing in the third and fourth specifications of error that would justify a reversal of the judgment. The first and second specifications relate to the question of law reserved. That question has been so fully considered and satisfactorily disposed of by the learned president of the court below, in his opinion sent up with the record, that little, if anything, can be added thereto; and we- therefore affirm the judgment on Iris opinion.
¶2Judgment affirmed.