¶1The learned trial judge rightly held that the agreements, between Leiling and Ott constituted a conditional sale and pot a bailment; and hence there was no error in directing a verdict in favor of the defendant in the issue. All that can be profitably said on the controlling question in the case will be found in the able and exhaustive opinion of the court below' on the rule for a new trial. On it we affirm the judgment.
166 Pa. 217
Ott v. Sweatman
Decided January 21, 1895
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1895-01-21
Appeal, No. 6, Juljr T., 1894, by plaintiff, ¿rom judgment of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., June T., 1890, No. 212, on a verdict for the defendant. Sheriff’s interpleader. Before Jenkins, J. [3 Dist.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1895-01-21
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently June 1967 · most notably Schmaltz v. York Manufacturing Co. (1902), 114 Pa. Super. 544 - General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Hartman (1934)
11 federal appellate · 14 district · 25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →