¶1All the facts necessary to a proper understanding and correct disposition of this case are sufficient!y presented in the auditor’s report; and the controlling questions arising thereon appear to have been carefully considered and rightly decided by him. Our examination of the record, with reference to the specifications of error, has failed to convince us that there is anything in either of them that requires a reversal or modification of the decree; nor do we think that either of the questions involved requires further elaboration. All that is necessary to be said in relation to any- of them will be found in the learned auditor’s report; and on it the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by appellant.
166 Pa. 304
Pepper's Estate
Decided February 4, 1895
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1895-02-04
Appeal, No. 173, July T., 1894, by Edward Pepper, from decree of C. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1890, No. 705, dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report. Exceptions to auditor’s report, From the record it appeared that Henry Flanders, Esq., was appointed auditor to settle and adjust the account of Joseph Norris, trustee under a .deed of trust executed by Charles Rockland Pepper on July 2,1868. The auditor reported as follows: “1.
Affirmed · Decided 1895-02-04