State v. Iniguez’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

cited by 72 later decisions

states following

July 2016

most recently cited

72 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably State v. Applegate (1999), State v. Hunziker (2002)

72 state decisions — followed in 10 states

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3651

Relies on Stafford v. Oklahoma · Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc. · Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona · United States v. Lemire · Kriz v. Buckeye Petroleum Co., Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“[b]ecause restitution also promotes the rehabilitative purpose of the criminal law, and because civil damage payments may not be fully compensatory, the court is not automatically foreclosed from ordering some restitution simply because the victim has received some compensation as a result of a civil action”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Kirby · State v. Hamilton
“[T]he distinction between civil damages and restitution means that the victim's release of civil liability does not prevent the court from ordering the criminal law remedy of restitution.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Laycock · 863 So. 2d 238 - Kirby v. State
“Restitution is not a claim which belongs to the victim, but a remedial measure that the court is statutorily obligated to employ.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Steffy · State v. Contreras

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.