Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

169 U.S. 365

Smith v. Naphtaly

Supreme Court of the United States · decided February 28, 1898.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · 8–1 · Opinion by Rufus Wheeler Peckham · Decided February 28, 1898.

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1978

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

50189819001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Henry F. Crane, for appellant.

A. T. Britton and A. R. Browne, for appellee.

Mr. Justice PECKHAM delivered the opinion of the court.

¶1

In this case counsel for the appellant concedes that if the court should hold that the sale of the land mentioned in the patent involved in the foregoing case (18 Sup. Ct. 354) were a valid sale, then the judgment in this case should be affirmed. As we do so hold, the judgment herein is therefore affirmed.

/169/us/365 · .json · Public domain