170 Vt.
Volume 170 — Vermont Reports
90 opinions
- 170 Vt. 1Rock v. Department of Taxes (1999)
- 170 Vt. 12John A. Russell Corp. v. Bohlig (1999)
- 170 Vt. 25White v. Quechee Lakes Landowners' Ass'n (1999)
- 170 Vt. 35State v. Longe (1999)
- 170 Vt. 51State v. Petruccelli (1999)
- 170 Vt. 64In Re Appeal of Miller (1999)
- 170 Vt. 77Vermont Tenants, Inc. v. Vermont Housing Finance Agency (1999)
- 170 Vt. 87Town of Rutland v. City of Rutland (1999)
- 170 Vt. 96Knight v. Rower (1999)
- 170 Vt. 108In re Appeal of Dooley (1999)
- 170 Vt. 115Lamare v. North Country Animal League (1999)
- 170 Vt. 125State v. Nelson (1999)
- 170 Vt. 137Beecher v. Stratton Corp. (1999)
- 170 Vt. 148In re D.T. (1999)
- 170 Vt. 167Sagar v. Warren Selectboard (1999)
- 170 Vt. 183Earle v. State (1999)
- 170 Vt. 194Baker v. State (1999)
- 170 Vt. 263Parker v. Gorczyk (1999)
- 170 Vt. 281Ulm v. Ford Motor Co. (2000)
- 170 Vt. 296State v. Kindle (2000)
- 170 Vt. 302United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Swann (2000)
- 170 Vt. 309Rocissono v. Spykes (2000)
- 170 Vt. 320In Re Appeal of Miserocchi (2000)
- 170 Vt. 329In re G.C. (2000)
- 170 Vt. 336State v. Mears (2000)
- 170 Vt. 346State v. Singer (2000)
<bold>1. Statutes — Maxims and Rules of Construction — Mandatory,</bold> <bold>Directory, and Permissive Provisions</bold> <block_quote> Determination of whether statutory language is mandatory or directory is one of legislative intent.</block_quote> <bold>2. Statutes — Maxims and Rules of Construction — Mandatory,</bold> <bold>Directory, and Permissive Provisions</bold> <block_quote> A statutory time limit is mandatory, rather than directory, only if it contains both an express requirement that action be undertaken within particular amount of time and a specified consequence for failure to comply with time limit.</block_quote> <bold>3. Highways — Motor Vehicles — Drivers Licenses</bold> Statutory time limit governing final hearings in civil license suspension proceedings is mandatory, rather than directory; accordingly, if final hearing is not held within forty-two days of date of alleged offense, proceeding must be dismissed unless State demonstrates either that it had defendant's consent or good cause for delay. <cross_reference>23 V.S.A. § 1205</cross_reference>(h).<page_number>Page 347</page_number><bold>4. Highways — Motor Vehicles — Drivers Licenses</bold> <block_quote> State failed to show good cause for delay in civil license suspension proceeding and thus trial court's dismissal of proceeding was proper, and fact that State was relying on blood test, rather than breath test, did not in and of itself constitute good cause for delay. <cross_reference>23 V.S.A. § 1205</cross_reference>(h).</block_quote>
- 170 Vt. 352In Re Appeal of Reynolds (2000)
- 170 Vt. 358Burlington v. GAS & ELEC. INS. SERVICES (2000)
- 170 Vt. 358City of Burlington v. Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services, Ltd. (2000)
- 170 Vt. 371State v. Carpenter (2000)
- 170 Vt. 377Grather v. Gables Inn, Ltd. (2000)
- 170 Vt. 387State v. Crannell (2000)
- 170 Vt. 409State v. Tongue (2000)
- 170 Vt. 415Martineau v. Guertin (2000)
- 170 Vt. 422McKinnon v. FH Morgan & Co., Inc. (2000)
- 170 Vt. 428Politi v. Tyler (2000)
- 170 Vt. 442Luneau v. Peerless Insurance (2000)
- 170 Vt. 450Bull v. Pinkham Engineering Assocs., Inc. (2000)
- 170 Vt. 464Guiel v. Allstate Insurance (2000)
- 170 Vt. 475LaFlamme v. Essex Junction School District (2000)
- 170 Vt. 485State v. Wootten (2000)
- 170 Vt. 496State v. Stone (2000)
- 170 Vt. 507In re G.T. (2000)
- 170 Vt. 535In re A.B. (1999)
- 170 Vt. 537State v. Scribner (1999)
- 170 Vt. 540Potter v. Potter (1999)
- 170 Vt. 541In re Interim Bylaw (1999)
- 170 Vt. 543State v. Maunsell (1999)
- 170 Vt. 547Stickney v. Stickney (1999)
- 170 Vt. 549In re Appeal of Herrick (1999)
- 170 Vt. 552Town of Andover v. State (1999)
- 170 Vt. 553Smith v. Town of Derby (1999)
- 170 Vt. 556Appeal of Gregoire (1999)
- 170 Vt. 560In re Thompson (1999)
- 170 Vt. 561State v. Defranceaux (1999)
- 170 Vt. 563Cantin v. Young (1999)
- 170 Vt. 565Carpenter v. Central Vermont Medical Center (1999)
- 170 Vt. 569State v. Morrissette (1999)
- 170 Vt. 571State v. Parker (1999)
- 170 Vt. 573State v. Grega (1999)
- 170 Vt. 576State v. Priest (1999)
- 170 Vt. 577In re Nawrath (2000)
- 170 Vt. 583Cooper v. Burnor (1999)
- 170 Vt. 587In re J.M. (2000)
- 170 Vt. 589Trask v. Department of Employment & Training (2000)
- 170 Vt. 592In re Butterfield (2000)
- 170 Vt. 595In Re Commercial Airfield (2000)
- 170 Vt. 597State v. Brooks (2000)
- 170 Vt. 599In re Andres (2000)
- 170 Vt. 603In re C.H. (2000)
- 170 Vt. 605State v. Free (2000)
- 170 Vt. 609Callan v. Hackett (2000)
- 170 Vt. 611In re J.M. (2000)
- 170 Vt. 614State v. Martin (2000)
- 170 Vt. 616In re Bailey (2000)
- 170 Vt. 618State v. Hayes (2000)
- 170 Vt. 620Reynolds v. Sterling College, Inc. (2000)
- 170 Vt. 623In Re Appeal of Sardi (2000)
- 170 Vt. 626Fucci v. Moseley & Fucci Associates, Ltd. (2000)
- 170 Vt. 628Gravel & Shea v. White Current Corp. (2000)
- 170 Vt. 632Fritzeen v. Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. (2000)
- 170 Vt. 635Peabody v. Home Insurance (2000)
- 170 Vt. 639Powers v. Hayes (2000)
- 170 Vt. 641Golden Key, LLC v. Harper (2000)
- 170 Vt. 642In Re LaMountain (2000)
- 170 Vt. 643Timberlake Associates v. City of Winooski (2000)
- 170 Vt. 646State v. Graves (2000)
- 170 Vt. 648Twin Valley Community Services, Inc. v. Town of Randolph (2000)
- 170 Vt. 650State v. Karov (2000)
- 170 Vt. 654State v. Nickerson (2000)