Kinman v. Omaha Public School District’s Empirical Analysis
171 F.3d 607 · 1999
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably Steven Vance, Minor, by and Through His Mother, Deborah Vance Alma McGowen Minor, by and Through Her Mother, Barbara Erfurth v. Spencer County Public School District Spencer County Board of Education (2000), Hopkins v. Saunders (1999)
18 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1681 (§ 901 of the Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972) · 20 U.S.C. § 1682 (Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Kentucky v. Graham · Arizona v. California · Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District · Jusino v. Brown · Lipsett v. University of Puerto Rico
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t would frustrate the purposes of Title IX to permit a damages remedy against a school district for a teacher's sexual harassment of a student based upon principles of respondeat superior or constructive notice, i.e., without actual notice to a school district official”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“when a court decides upon a rule of law, that decision should continue to govern the same issues in subsequent stages in the same case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“when an intervening decision from a superior tribunal clearly demonstrates the law of the case is wrong.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.