Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

173 Pa. 630

Arons v. Smit

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 17, 1896

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1896-02-17

Appeal, No. 83, Oct. Term, 1895, by defendant from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., No. 275J, July T., 1889, on verdict for plaintiff. Assumpsit to recover commissions on sales.

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 1923

4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1896-02-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam,

¶1This case appears to have been tried on its merits without strict regard to the questions of fact presented in the affidavit of defense. Testimony was accordingly introduced that war*633ranted the learned trial judge in charging as complained of in the first specification. After such testimony has been received, without objection, and the case submitted to the jury on the evidence thus before them, it is too late to complain of the introduction of testimony that was not strictly relevant under the issue presented by plaintiff’s statement and the defendant’s answer thereto. We find no error in the record, of which the defendant has any just reason to complain.

¶2Judgment affirmed.

/173/pa/630 · .json · Public domain