174 F. Supp. 2d 1097 - Switzer v. Rivera’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 2611 (§ 101 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2612 (§ 102 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2615 (§ 105 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson · Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co. · CPC International Inc. v. Dimmitt Agri Industries, Inc. · 52 Cal. 3d 65 - Rojo v. Kliger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) intended to cause harmful or offensive contact, and (2) such contact did occur.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.