Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

174 Pa. 302

Cooper v. Mills

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 9, 1896

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1896-03-09

Appeal, No. 152, Jan. T., 1896, by Benjamin C. Potts, from order.of C. P. Delaware Co., Sept. T., 1898, No. 11, dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report. Exceptions to auditor’s report distributing fund raised by receiver’s sale of the property of Rose Yalley Mills, a corporation. W. Roger Fronenfield, the auditor, found the facts to be as follows: The attorney for Wm.

Affirmed · Decided 1896-03-09

Per Curiam,

¶1The findings of fact made by the learned auditor seem to us to justify the decree appealed from. He found from the evidence before him that the corporation, the Rose Valley Mills, was in possession of the factory as a tenant by virtue of .an assignment to them of the lease of Coates and Potts. This being so, it was liable for the rent either to the landlord or to Coates *306and Potts, Its assignors. Moreover, the property upon the premises belonging to them was liable to distraint upon a landlord’s warrant issued against Coates and Potts. The claim for rent was therefore a preferred claim and the mortgage worked no injury to other creditors. Neither of the assignments of error is sustained.

¶2The judgment is affirmed.

/174/pa/302 · .json · Public domain