¶1 The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Eichen’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 342 N.J.Super. 120, 775 A.2d 748 (2001).
¶2 Opposed — None.
175 N.J. 200
814 A.2d 1042
Decided October 10, 2002
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 2002-10-10
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2015
14 state decisions
Relies on 342 N.J. Super. 120 - McQueen v. Brown
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2002-10-10
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Eichen’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 342 N.J.Super. 120, 775 A.2d 748 (2001).
¶2 Opposed — None.