¶1 The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Weissbard’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 351 N.J.Super. 93, 797 A.2d 175 (2002).
¶2 Opposed — None.
175 N.J. 612
818 A.2d 1284
Decided April 8, 2003
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 2003-04-08
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 2006
3 state decisions
Relies on 351 N.J. Super. 93 - State v. Rivera
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2003-04-08
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Weissbard’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 351 N.J.Super. 93, 797 A.2d 175 (2002).
¶2 Opposed — None.