Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

175 N.Y. 499

67 N.E 1091

Westerfield v. . Rogers

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1903

New York Court of Appeals · decided 1903-06-05

<p>Motion for reargument. (See 174 N. Y. 230.)</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1903-06-05

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1966 · most notably Crawford v. Burke (1904), Myers v. International Trust Co. (1923)

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 22 state decisions

1001903191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 Motion denied and the remittitur recalled and amended so as to provide that “ the judgment entered upon the report of the referee should be modified by deducting from the amount *500 found owing by Thomas Rogers the amount of §131,778.53, which had been appropriated by Cauldwell prior to the 8th of December, 1895, with the interest allowed thereon; and that the judgment herein directing a sale of the property turned over to the trustees by Cauldwell should be modified by adding thereto that out of the proceeds of such property the amount paid out by the new trustee for the preservation of the property after the removal of Cauldwell and Rogers, as trustees, with the consent of the plaintiffs, be first paid ; and that the remaining proceeds of such property, if aüy, be applied upon the moneys appropriated by Cauldwell prior to the 8th day of December, 1895; and if any remains it be applied upon the joint indebtedness of the two trustees; and that the judgment as so modified be affirmed, with costs to these plaintiffs.” In case the parties are unable to agree, the form of the judgment to be settled by IIaight, J.

/175/ny/499 · .json · Public domain