Starr v. George’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 25 U.S.C. § 1302 (§ 202 of the Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968) · 25 U.S.C. § 1901 (§ 2 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978) · 25 U.S.C. § 1902 (§ 3 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978) · 25 U.S.C. § 1903 (§ 4 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978) · 25 U.S.C. § 1911 (§ 101 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978) · 28 U.S.C. § 1738
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp. · Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams · Bryan v. Itasca County · Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Hunt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[JJudicial proceedings ... shall have the same full faith and credit in every court within the United States and its Territories and Possessions as they have by law or usage in the courts of such State, Territory or Possession from which they are taken.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Simmonds v. Parks“[flull faith and credit ... requires that the issuing court afford the parties due process and render its judgment in accordance with federal and state constitutional standards.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Simmonds v. Parks“once full faith and credit principles are found to apply, the receiving court is very restricted in the kinds of collateral attacks that it is allowed to entertain,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Simmonds v. Parks
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.