Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

177 A.3d 822

Commonwealth v. Brooks, C., Pet

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 2018

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2018-01-03

Relies on Commonwealth v. Muniz, J., Aplt.

Decided 2018-01-03

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM

¶2 AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

1. Is it unconstitutional to require [Petitioner]' to register for a lifetime when said registration requirement exceeds the statutory maximum penalty for [Petitioner’s] offense?
2. Is the Adam Walsh Statute unconstitutional in requiring the [Petitioner] to register for a lifetime?

¶3 The judgment of sentence'is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for reconsideration in light of Commonwealth v. Muniz, — Pa. -, 164 A.3d 1189 (2017).

/177/a3d/822 · .json · Public domain