Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 177 Ga. App. 36 - Bowers v. State

177 Ga. App. 36 - Bowers v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

57 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably Dunagan v. State (1998), 223 Ga. App. 772 - Strickland v. State (1996)

57 state decisions

2901985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Stonaker · State v. Estevez · Adsitt v. State · Cain v. State · 145 Ga. App. 328 - Riddle v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Both crimes [assault with intent to injure and assault by scaring the victim] proscribe the same general acts, to wit: either the subjection of another to the possibility of personal injury; or, the actual infliction of such an injury on the victim. The two crimes potentially differ only in one respect. In the case of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, the attempted or the completed injury to the victim is the intended consequence of the defendant’s act. In the case of reckless conduct, the threatened or the actual injury to the victim is, instead, the product of the defendant’s criminal negligence. This similarity between the proscribed acts, coupled with a dissimilarity between the mental culpability which produces those acts, would indicate the potential for reckless conduct to be deemed, as a matter of law, a lesser included offense of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[Wjhere the defendant is charged by a narrowly drawn indictment with a specific crime it is not within the power of the judge or the jury to interpret the facts as presented at trial to support an alternative, separate offense. Criminal indictments are not deemed amendable to conform to the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Thus, the crime of reckless conduct is, in essence, an instance of criminal negligence, rather than an intentional act, which causes bodily harm to or endangers the bodily safety of another.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.