Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 Ind. App. 624 - Scates v. State

178 Ind. App. 624 - Scates v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
April 2010
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently April 2010

15 state decisions

11019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Maloy v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of West Palm Beach · Montgomery v. Crum · 125 Ind. App. 560 - Merritt v. Economy Department Store, Inc. · Raymond v. Simonson · Schuh v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For a wrongful act to give rise to a cause of action and thus to commence the running of the statute of limitations, it is not necessary that the extent of the damage be known or ascertainable but only that damage has occurred. ["JExcept in cases of fraud where the statute expressly provides otherwise, the statutory period of limitations begins to run from the time when liability for wrong has arisen even though the injured party may be ignorant of the existence of the wrong or injury. Consequential damages may flow later from an injury too slight to be noticed at the time it is inflicted. No new cause of action accrues when such consequential damages arise. So far as such consequential damages may be reasonably anticipated, they may be included in a recovery for the original injury, though even at the time of the trial they may not yet exist. When substantial damage may result from any wrong affecting the person or property of another, a cause of action for such wrong immediately acerues.["] ... "Considering the function of a Statute of Limitations as a device for repose, a potential defendant's equities are the same whether the plaintiff knows of his condition or not. Repose is as beneficial to society in the one case as in the other."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[Thhe statute of limitations will not await the pleasure or convenience of the plaintiff.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[ilf the State did not formally institute eminent domain proceedings,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.