¶1We find no error in the proceedings leading up to the decree from which this appeal was taken, nor in the decree itself. The findings of fact were amply warranted by the pleadings and proofs; and the conclusions drawn from the facts thus established appear to be substantially correct. On these findings and legal conclusions of the court below, the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs, to be paid by appellant.
178 Pa. 346
Katz v. Johnston
Decided November 9, 1896
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1896-11-09
Appeal, No. 28, Oct. T., 1896, by-defendant, from decree of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny County, Jan. Term, 1896, No. 187, on bill in equity. Bill in equity for an account and for an injunction. White, J., filed the following opinion: On the 28th day of March, 1893, the plaintiff and defendant bought from W. J. Dible and J. E. Hunter a piece of ground in Turtle Creek, this county, containing about one acre, and the deed was executed to them of that date.
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1949
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1896-11-09
View the full empirical analysis of this case →