Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

18 Me. 21

Whitcomb v. Higgins

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 15, 1840

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · decided 1840-07-15

<p>The enlistment of a minor under the age of eighteen years, into a company raised at large, is void, and to be regarded as if it had never taken place.</p>

Cited in Bouvier (1914)’s definition of “Notice To Produce Papers”

Decided 1840-07-15

¶1The opinion of the Court was drawn up by

Weston C. J.

¶2The right of the defendant in error, to be exempted from military duty in the standing company, depends upon the validity of his enlistment in the independent company. The law has fixed the age of eighteen, as the period when a liabil*23ity to do military duty shall commence. At an earlier age, the physical system is not sufficiently developed, to sustain the hardships and privations of actual service, to which the militia are liable to be subjected, at the call of their country. We are very clear, therefore, that an enlistment under eighteen, should be regarded as a nullity. An independent company, admitting members of a more tender age, would not have that efficiency, which the service requires. They are equally, with other parts of the militia, subject to the paramount law of Congress, which has determined the age, when citizens shall be subject to military duty.

¶3 Judgment reversed.

/18/me/21 · .json · Public domain