180 Pa. 22
Decided January 25, 1897
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1897-01-25
Appeal, No. 316, Jan. T., 1896, by plaintiffs, from order of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., Dec. T. 1894, No. 554, malting absolute a rule to set aside service of process. Rui e to set aside service of process.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1897-01-25
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently May 1972
2 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1There appears to be nothing in this record that would justify us in sustaining either of the specifications.
¶2For reasons given by the learned president of the common pleas, we are all of opinion that the service of the writ of summons was rightly set aside. There is nothing in the case that requires special notice.
¶3Judgment affirmed.